<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What has Time Warner Cable done for you lately?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/</link>
	<description>TV, mobile and Internet: Covering technology&#039;s monthly bill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:41:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbyd</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-5190</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-5190</guid>
		<description>When I get my new tv this year,I think I going to drop TW. Hook up the computer to the TV and use itunes or Hulu.Rent from Netflix.Pay for what I want to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I get my new tv this year,I think I going to drop TW. Hook up the computer to the TV and use itunes or Hulu.Rent from Netflix.Pay for what I want to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-5114</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-5114</guid>
		<description>To everyone who thinks a-la-carte is the answer ... It&#039;s not a realisitic possibility for ANY cable or satellite company to offer.  You won&#039;t find a single company that does.  Dish, DirecTV, uVerse, FiOS ... none of them offer it.  The only current option would be to pay per program (like on itunes, AppleTV, or free like on hulu).

This is because of network providers insisting on bundled contracts (i.e. in order for Time Warner to provide MTV, it must also buy MTV2, VH1, Nickelodeon, etc).

Additionally, the more channels that are available to more subscribers, the more ad revenue can be charged.  If a-la-carte was available, you decide you don&#039;t want certain channels from Viacom (for example you only want MTV &amp; VH1 but not Nickelodeon and the other 15 Viacom channels), then Viacom will just charge more for MTV and VH1 to make up for lost ad revenue (and the provider will charge more for their increased expense to Viacom and their lost ad revenue).

Finally, it will create massive backoffice redtape for the provider to manage individual channel availability to the subscriber rather than a select number of pre-determined packages.  Of course the provider will pass the cost of this along (increased IT infrastructure, customer service reps to handle calls from people who call daily to add/remove the channels they don&#039;t want to watch this week because repeats are on, etc).

And of course even if that were possible, the individual channel availabilty would only be on the digital channels since there is no realistic way to manage it in the analog (currently they use a filter to determine from the most basic analog and the full analog package .... feasbile with 2 package options, but not feasible when there are 80 channels with virtually unlimited combinations).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To everyone who thinks a-la-carte is the answer &#8230; It&#8217;s not a realisitic possibility for ANY cable or satellite company to offer.  You won&#8217;t find a single company that does.  Dish, DirecTV, uVerse, FiOS &#8230; none of them offer it.  The only current option would be to pay per program (like on itunes, AppleTV, or free like on hulu).</p>
<p>This is because of network providers insisting on bundled contracts (i.e. in order for Time Warner to provide MTV, it must also buy MTV2, VH1, Nickelodeon, etc).</p>
<p>Additionally, the more channels that are available to more subscribers, the more ad revenue can be charged.  If a-la-carte was available, you decide you don&#8217;t want certain channels from Viacom (for example you only want MTV &amp; VH1 but not Nickelodeon and the other 15 Viacom channels), then Viacom will just charge more for MTV and VH1 to make up for lost ad revenue (and the provider will charge more for their increased expense to Viacom and their lost ad revenue).</p>
<p>Finally, it will create massive backoffice redtape for the provider to manage individual channel availability to the subscriber rather than a select number of pre-determined packages.  Of course the provider will pass the cost of this along (increased IT infrastructure, customer service reps to handle calls from people who call daily to add/remove the channels they don&#8217;t want to watch this week because repeats are on, etc).</p>
<p>And of course even if that were possible, the individual channel availabilty would only be on the digital channels since there is no realistic way to manage it in the analog (currently they use a filter to determine from the most basic analog and the full analog package &#8230;. feasbile with 2 package options, but not feasible when there are 80 channels with virtually unlimited combinations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swest</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator>Swest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-5106</guid>
		<description>TW should get with the program, esp. in this economy and people will cut back. I myself dont watch much cable much anymore (57 channels and nothing much on anymore) I rely mostly on internet to watch re runs and online rental services like Net flix. 

Ala carte should be the standard. Who watches those religious shows, foreign language etc etc and Im paying nearly 100 month along with the high speed internet? MAJOR RIP OFF.

Im moving out of state anyway--Im sure tw is not offered there. Cox seems to be the major provider where I am going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TW should get with the program, esp. in this economy and people will cut back. I myself dont watch much cable much anymore (57 channels and nothing much on anymore) I rely mostly on internet to watch re runs and online rental services like Net flix. </p>
<p>Ala carte should be the standard. Who watches those religious shows, foreign language etc etc and Im paying nearly 100 month along with the high speed internet? MAJOR RIP OFF.</p>
<p>Im moving out of state anyway&#8211;Im sure tw is not offered there. Cox seems to be the major provider where I am going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Guerrero</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-5100</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Guerrero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-5100</guid>
		<description>Why deal with cable at all, especially Time-Warner? Verizon FIOS blows them away. The BEST thing I ever did was to get rid of Time-Warner Cable. If you have the chance to get Verizon FIOS, do it!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why deal with cable at all, especially Time-Warner? Verizon FIOS blows them away. The BEST thing I ever did was to get rid of Time-Warner Cable. If you have the chance to get Verizon FIOS, do it!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syscom3</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-5092</link>
		<dc:creator>syscom3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-5092</guid>
		<description>If Time-Warner doesn&#039;t provide more ala carte channel selections, I will go to satellite.

I cant believe I would have to subscribe to both premium tiers just to get the 4 shows I want.

On the bright side, I am satisfied with their customer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Time-Warner doesn&#8217;t provide more ala carte channel selections, I will go to satellite.</p>
<p>I cant believe I would have to subscribe to both premium tiers just to get the 4 shows I want.</p>
<p>On the bright side, I am satisfied with their customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-5020</guid>
		<description>Of course Time Warner can do what they want.  In many parts of OC there is no alternative.  I have checked for Verison Fios NOT available, ATT Uverse NOT available.  So I have no choice in Anaheim but to stay with TW or go back to broadcast only.  

This is the problem when 1 company is allowed to monopolize any market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Time Warner can do what they want.  In many parts of OC there is no alternative.  I have checked for Verison Fios NOT available, ATT Uverse NOT available.  So I have no choice in Anaheim but to stay with TW or go back to broadcast only.  </p>
<p>This is the problem when 1 company is allowed to monopolize any market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-4986</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-4986</guid>
		<description>Good riddence. Good bye MTV, VH1 two lame channels! There really needs to be a la carte. People should be able to buy the channels they want to watch without having to subscribe to bigger packages. The few channels that I do watch are spread between Basic and the most high up packages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good riddence. Good bye MTV, VH1 two lame channels! There really needs to be a la carte. People should be able to buy the channels they want to watch without having to subscribe to bigger packages. The few channels that I do watch are spread between Basic and the most high up packages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-4976</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-4976</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time for everyone to face it: The way we watch TV is all wrong. It&#039;s geared toward making profits for the signal providers, whether they be cable, satellite or fiber based.

Why can&#039;t I sign on online and pick and choose what I want to watch when I want to watch it? I would be much happier paying $2-$3 per channel per month for the 5 or so channels I actually watch than $60 or more to a cable company for sports and other channels I don&#039;t need.

Viacom has it right. I watch Colbert and South Park online anytime I want at my convenience. It&#039;s much better than waiting for it to roll around on TV. I hope Time Warner dies a quick death between their fee hikes and failed negotiations with content providers. This past week has just proven how much of a dinosaur cable is today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time for everyone to face it: The way we watch TV is all wrong. It&#8217;s geared toward making profits for the signal providers, whether they be cable, satellite or fiber based.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t I sign on online and pick and choose what I want to watch when I want to watch it? I would be much happier paying $2-$3 per channel per month for the 5 or so channels I actually watch than $60 or more to a cable company for sports and other channels I don&#8217;t need.</p>
<p>Viacom has it right. I watch Colbert and South Park online anytime I want at my convenience. It&#8217;s much better than waiting for it to roll around on TV. I hope Time Warner dies a quick death between their fee hikes and failed negotiations with content providers. This past week has just proven how much of a dinosaur cable is today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10ACGirl</title>
		<link>http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2008/12/30/what-has-time-warner-cable-done-for-you-lately/7176/comment-page-1/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>10ACGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/?p=7176#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>Well, if they don&#039;t reach an agreement with Viacom and we lose 19 channels, I&#039;m not going to be a very happy Time Warner customer.  I left Dish Network to return to Time Warner earlier this year when Dish didn&#039;t expand Noggin to the 24 hours a day that everyone else did.  I know it&#039;s a bit silly, but when you have a sick kid up in the middle of the night, watching a &quot;kid show&quot; at 3:00 in the morning seems to help them get back to sleep...unlike having BIlly Mays yell at you about buying something you don&#039;t need.  I&#039;m hoping they reach an agreement before 9pm (local time) on Wednesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if they don&#8217;t reach an agreement with Viacom and we lose 19 channels, I&#8217;m not going to be a very happy Time Warner customer.  I left Dish Network to return to Time Warner earlier this year when Dish didn&#8217;t expand Noggin to the 24 hours a day that everyone else did.  I know it&#8217;s a bit silly, but when you have a sick kid up in the middle of the night, watching a &#8220;kid show&#8221; at 3:00 in the morning seems to help them get back to sleep&#8230;unlike having BIlly Mays yell at you about buying something you don&#8217;t need.  I&#8217;m hoping they reach an agreement before 9pm (local time) on Wednesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

