Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
The Gadgetress ~ TV, mobile and Internet: Covering technology's monthly bill

Report claims 4,600 jobs lost if Calif. forces TVs to be more energy efficient

April 2nd, 2009, 12:50 pm · 6 Comments · posted by

If the California Energy Commission moves forward with a proposal to require TVs meet new energy efficiency requirements, the state would lose $50 million in sales tax and retailers would have to cut 4,600 jobs here, according to a report out today by the Consumer Electronics Association.

And that, says the CEA, is because the higher standards would essentially prohibit TVs above 40-inches from being sold in California, a story you may have read earlier (see “State considers ban on big screen TVs”).

The report also mentions that most Energy Star-approved TVs don’t meet the state’s highest goals for efficiency — a fact that tech-review site CNET also points out.  

But wait! There is another side to the tale. The state’s. The California Energy Commission says that TVs today use up 10 percent of a household’s energy use (a factoid cited by PG&E, actually). It wants TV makers to reduce energy consumption by 33 percent by 2011, and 49 percent by 2013.

Lost jobs? Umm … not quite, says the state commission.

“The Consumer Electronics Association assumes that televisions that do not comply with the proposed efficiency standards will simply go away, leaving a void in the marketplace. For an industry that prides itself on innovation, this premise is simply flawed. Innovation, like energy efficiency, will drive the market and offer televisions with new features for a media-savvy consumer. New energy efficient models will take the place of inefficient TVs offering the same or better performance. Consumers overwhelmingly want efficient TVs; retailers will now be able to market their products to a desirable demographic,” says the state’s FAQ page.

You can read both sides by clicking the links below.

Both sides count Vizio as a supporter. Vizio, the Irvine-based TV maker, has become one of the largest big-screen TV sellers in the past two years. The state cites Vizio as a supporter while the CEA points to a Vizio co-founder’s note that making more energy-efficient TVs would raise the cost of every TV by “tens of dollars.” 

Vizio, in fact, says that the Eco TV, its first energy-efficient TV introduced last fall, was so successful, the company plans to roll out the technology to all of its TVs.

“We’re way ahead of the curve as far as energy requirements,” said Jim Noyd, a Vizio spokesman. “We introduced that one TV last year and now we have a whole group of TVs from 19 to 42 inches. They exceed the Energy Star ratings by up to 25 percent. … We’re also working with the rest of the Vizio line to meet the Energy Star ratings for 2009.”

Its 32-inch LCD Eco HDTV, by the way, is $499.

**LINKS**

More TV news: Check out the Gadgetress Guide to local TV services. Latest TV services headlines:

ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Comments
Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our User Agreement.
  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic.
  2. No profanity, vulgarity, racial slurs or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

 6 Comments

  • Josh says:

    Many people may remember when automakers said that if they have to put a drivers-side airbag in every car, then only rich people would be able to buy a car. Some people are old enough to remember when they said the same thing about mandatory seatbelts back in the mid-sixties.
    .
    Is it really surprising, or “news”, that many TVs manufactured today don’t meet proposed energy efficiency guidelines targeted for 4 years from now? That’s like being surprised that my new house doesn’t incorporate all the proposed future changes to the building code.

  • sammy says:

    Actually, the air bag thing is not a correct analogy. How about the state mandating 2% electric vehicles on the road… now all we have are empty charging stations.

    Is there anything that would keep me from getting a big screen from an on-line retailer or out-of-state? Are we to have TV police?

    Why not just a giant tax… the rich would pay the tax and there’s be the incentive to “go green”.

    Then again, buy all your stuff online and avoid sales tax all together.

  • Enlightenment says:

    Hey report authors, put up or shut up, give us the exact details of how the 4600 was calculated and what specific jobs would be lost? If you can’t, then it is just a bogus number that you pulled out of your a$$.

  • Enlightenment says:

    All electronic products should have MORE EFFICIENT POWER SUPPLIES, especially TV’s, Computers, Game Machines, …

  • tom says:

    there already is a consumer awareness program that allows and informs people about the cost of operating TVs etc. Let them make their own choice. The CEC is the one who has the legal responsibility to do an independent (impossible since they are the regulator) unbiased and unequivocal analysis of the cost/benefit before taking away the consumers’ rights. They have NOT done that and have used smoke and mirrors anad outright fibs to cook thier books.

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline