
Spotted: If you haven’t been impressed with the set-top box from your TV provider, neither is the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. It issued a report this week calling set-top box innovation “lacking.”
The observation, as noted by Reuters, was just one of many in the FCC’s ongoing effort to develop a national broadband Internet plan.
“The convergence of television and the Internet is hindered by the lack of innovation in the set top box market,” says the government report.
| Read the report Read the shorter news release |
The FCC has about 60 more days before its national broadband plan is due. The reason for calling out set-top box hardware is the FCC feels adding Internet to a box could help the consumers nationwide get Web access.
“Requiring video services providers to supply a small, low-cost, network-interface device whose only function is to bridge proprietary network elements with retail navigation devices,” is one suggestion.
Reuters reports that one option being considered is for cable and broadband providers to supply a device so the box could access the Internet modem.
Coincidentally, I wrote last month that such technology already exists. It’s just not being used. Broadcom Corp., the Irvine chip maker that supplies chips to many set-top box makers, offers such features in its silicon chip. But it’s up to the box maker or the service provider to turn it on. See the story: “11 things a DVR should do.”
TVs and other TV gadgets are also bridging the connection. TV makers like LG and Vizio have either introduced Internet TVs or plan to. Game consoles and TV devices like Roku offer Internet on a TV, allowing users to stream movies and video from Netflix and YouTube.
Other observations of the FCC report:
Recent stories on set-top boxes and web TV:

I have developed an innovative set-top box. Any idea who I can contact at the FCC?
Funny that you posted this article, I was just mentioning to my wife 2 nights ago how the set top boxes were a joke and could do *so* much more than they currently do. I am getting pretty close to dumping TWC.
all the boxes have ethernet and usb…the problem is the providers do not activate them…my daughter used to charge her ipod when we have the moxi…now she cannot do it with our present box…maybe the providers want more money for them to activate these…
I got along for about three decades on cable with no set-top box at all. Cable-ready TVs, VCRs, and DVRs did the job for me.
In theory, CableCARD is supposed to allow us the same freedom, even with Digital Cable, even with bi-directional Digital Cable, even with premium channels, even with pay-per-view. In theory, you would just stick a CableCARD into your TV, DVR, etc., and that equipment is fully cable-ready for your cable system. CableCARD also is supposed to allow you to buy your own cable converter box off the shelf instead of having to rent a converter box from your cable company.
In practice, the cable companies have seen to it that CableCARD has been a failure. They’ve fought it all the way. They’ve made changes to their systems to make them incompatible with existing CableCARD equipment. They rent you the CableCARD instead of the converter box (the cost is less, though). They require that you have to have a technician come out and install each CableCARD–no do-it-yourself option.
Few TV models support CableCARD. TiVo makes a couple of HD DVR models that take CableCARD, but I think that’s about it; Samsung announced their SMT-3090 CableCARD DVR a year and a half ago but apparently never delivered it. Off-the-shelf converter boxes are pretty hard to find (I’ve never seen one, myself).
So here we are, having to whine about the limitations of the converter boxes that the cable companies deign to let us rent from them.