
Chances are high that your next TV set-top box will have features like a multi-room DVR, Internet access and home networking — even if you’re a cable TV customer, says Michael Inouye, a TV industry analyst with ABI Research.
In a new report, Inouye projects that there will be 15 million next-generation set-top boxes in the market by 2014. These 15 million boxes will have MoCA, a technology that uses existing coaxial cables to send video to devices throughout the home. While other home networking technologies like Powerline (uses electrical lines) and HomePNA (uses phone lines), are gunning to be in the next set-top box, Inouye said that MoCA is attracting the TV companies that actually provide the hardware to consumers.
My first thought? Cable companies have long offered set-top boxes with advanced features. But they haven’t enabled them. The USB and eSATA ports on my cable TV box don’t work so I can’t add a hard drive to store more TV shows or view photos. I asked Inouye to tell us what really might happen with future set-top boxes.
“Indeed, you are spot on in regards to cable providers’ previous practices of limiting STB (set-top box) functions. But in many cases just because it’s not ‘active’ doesn’t mean it’s not there, so when we established the forecast we focused on estimating the number of boxes that could support MoCA (e.g. hardware in place) but not necessarily active,” Inouye said in an e-mailed response.
Ahh… so, no MoCA features for cable customers. No, not quite, Inouye said. He said that several cable companies — including Time Warner Cable and Cox Communications – are committed to MoCA.
While MoCA on the boxes may initially be inactive, he said, “This also doesn’t mean it will always be inactive, the cable operator can just ‘flip the switch’ as it were to turn it on when they are ready. … A very large number of the cable operators in the U.S. will embrace MoCA. MoCA in general will compete in areas with high coax/cable penetration, North America being such a region.”
Cable companies need to start offering more services, like the multi-room DVR, because the competition is already doing so. Verizon FiOS, AT&T U-verse and the satellite companies have long offered the feature to users. Cable? So far, Cox has announced it is coming while Time Warner says it is committed.
Inouye said that making the integration easier are companies like Irvine’s Broadcom Corp., which is responsible for several set-top box chips that already have MoCA. Because Broadcom chips are already heading to new set top boxes, the TV provider can simply activate MoCA by pushing out a software upgrade. Another set-top box chipmaker, San Diego’s Entropic Communications, is also pushing the technology and recently added DirecTV as a customer.
“The general perception has historically been the cable providers have lagged in terms of things like home networking – which was true. Verizon is already using MoCA and AT&T is using HomePNA in their boxes – other Telcos are also using various networking solutions. DirecTV currently offers adapters for Wi-Fi and Powerline to connect their HD DVRs for VOD but in the end they decided to integrate MoCA,” he said.
Favoring MoCA could also lead to the next big evolution in TV service: Watching TV online. Inouye links MoCA with TV Everywhere, the Comcast Corp. and Time Warner-backed service to offer some cable TV shows online to paying customers.
“The cable operators however are starting to move in a similar direction and are expected to start pushing more advanced features – perhaps in some small part furthering their ‘TV Everywhere’ concept.”
Beyond the multi-room DVR, MoCA has other features consumers can look forward to, Inouye added. Read his complete unedited responses below:
QUESTION: Your projection is for 15 million boxes to have MoCA by 2014, but cable companies are known for limiting set-top box features. Do you believe cable providers really plan to turn on the feature?
![]() Michael Inouye |
INOUYE: Indeed, you are spot on in regards to cable providers’ previous practices of limiting STB functions. But in many cases just because it’s not “active” doesn’t mean it’s not there, so when we established the forecast we focused on estimating the number of boxes that could support MoCA (e.g. hardware in place) but not necessarily active – this also doesn’t mean it will always be inactive, the cable operator can just “flip the switch” as it were to turn it on when they are ready. With a multi-room DVR set-up you also need more than one MoCA ready box – e.g. the DVR and a “thin client” or another STB.
Broadcom offers integrated SoCs (system on a chip) with MoCA for cable set-top boxes (BCM7420, BCM7408, and BCM7410) which will likely spur adoption and Entropic Communications, the main incumbent, already has traction with Verizon (which is often classified as a cable operator) and recently announced DirecTV (as a note we put Verizon with the Telcos).
I’ll discuss which cable operators in the next question but suffice it to say a very large number of the cable operators in the US will embrace MoCA. MoCA in general will compete in areas with high coax/cable penetration, North America being such a region. While other regions like Europe have yet to gain traction, many of the operators are still in the early stages (e.g. still trying to decide which technology to embrace) or just starting to gain interest in home networking, although interest is reportedly starting to pick up – so for those countries with higher coax penetration there are opportunities for MoCA.
In the next question you mentioned satellite and IPTV providers in place of cable, I imagine because the general perception has historically been the cable providers have lagged in terms of things like home networking – which was true. Verizon is already using MoCA and AT&T is using HomePNA in their boxes – other Telcos are also using various networking solutions. DirecTV currently offers adapters for Wi-Fi and Powerline to connect their HD DVRs for VOD but in the end they decided to integrate MoCA – although it is worth noting that MoCA and the HomePlug Powerline Alliance entered a “formal liaison agreement” to combine their efforts by sharing information and working to further educate and inform outside parties about home networking – so in cases where coax is not available there might be a good chance Powerline might fill these gaps.
The cable operators however are starting to move in a similar direction and are expected to start pushing more advanced features – perhaps in some small part furthering their “TV Everywhere” concept). The process will likely focus on multi-room DVRs at first, before extending to other areas, but there is opportunity beyond muti-room alone (more on this in the last question).
Q: Which cable providers have committed to this? Or are you talking more about satellite and IP TV providers?
INOUYE: Currently Bright House, Comcast, Cox, and Time Warner have committed to use MoCA but in time I would be surprised to see a US based cable operator using a different technology for home networking. There is traction in the satellite market as I mentioned earlier (Echostar is also on the Board of Directors and they still supply Dish with most of their boxes) and Telco if you include Verizon as an IPTV provider.
Q: What other useful consumer features does Moca offer? Or what can consumers look forward to?
INOUYE: One of the companies I spoke with perhaps best summed up the progression – the first wave is creating ties to the pay-TV operators and enabling things like multi-room DVR. The next wave deals with IP distribution. Since networking technologies lend themselves to transferring data over IP this creates new opportunities to link other networked devices.
Before we get to this point however there are a couple of key milestones, if you will, that need to be met first. Content protection is paramount and one potential solution is DTCP-IP which is now included with DLNA - although the limited number of DTCP-IP supported devices in the field is creating some hesitation amongst the service providers of extending their in home networks to third party devices.
Although the PS3 through firmware update now includes DTCP-IP and if we consider the sheer growth in the number of TV models that are DLNA certified we can expect a far more amenable environment for moving IP content throughout the home in the not too distant future; in addition as more operators move towards gateway like devices this will further integrate the operator CPE into the home network.
It is important to note that MoCA has been incorporated into DLNA’s Interoperability Guidelines. Once the home is “IP ready” then we can expect more devices to start embracing networking technologies outside of Ethernet and Wi-Fi like MoCA. Connected TVs for instance could add MoCA and interface with the DVR or STB for additional content. MoCA could also extend into things like Home Automation. This could tie into the “TV Everywhere” concept – that is so long as a consumer subscribers to a particular pay-TV service then he/she would be able to watch related content throughout their home network, not just through the service provider STB.
Recently on MoCA, DVRs and cable TV:

How about a cable box that always responds immediately to user input? Too many times the box seems to have more important things to do then actually respond to the remote.
How about out-of-band controls? I would like to control the box from a computer instead of covering up the program playing on the TV with channel information.
I would like to see a soft reboot to unscramble the cable brain instead of the shutdown and restart that stops the current recording.
2 months back I moved from my cox cable HD/DVR box to Moxi 3 Tuner HD + 2 mate (boxes that connect to main HD DVR mothership through MoCA). You just need to pay for the hardware ($999) but the DVR service is free (need to pay $1.99 to cox for cablecard)
You can add storage, control DVR from the internet and much more!!
We moved from Tivo to Moxi after my friend’s recommendation. I am very happy with Moxi, especially we don’t have to pay monthly DVR fees.
Biggest problem is the lackluster size of the HDDs in boxes. A 1TB drive costs under $100, yet Cox and others offer boxes with measly 160GB drives. Pathetic if you ask me.
What good is a multi-room DVR going to be if I’m still stuck with paltry storage?
They need to open up their eSATA ports already.
Cable sux. Go with Dish network. 300gb on their DVR’s plus you can plug in an additional drive via usb.
Just get TIVO, I have two high def tivos and they are the best, I also have FIOS but no longer use their DVR. I used to have Tme Warner and their DVR was junk. Go with FIOS if you can and get a High Def Tivo, you won’t regret it.
Wish we could but no FIOS in our area. TIVO was fantastic (we had DirecTivo before the HD channels) but we could not use it in our new place, had the crappy DVR from Comcast, could not get a new one when Time Warner took over, now we are back with DirecTV but using their DVR. We just didn’t want to buy a new TIVO because we have every conceivable device hooked up, lol, and were holding out for cable to support the cable card – which the never did, of course! Between the AppleTV, the PS 3, the Wii, and the DVR I think we’re out of inputs.
The multi-room DVR alone makes Uverse a much better option than cable. I’d never go back to a oneTV-DVR set-up.
Frankly, I don’t trust the cable companies (Cox especially) nor Inouye’s opinion.
I wear an eye patch even though I don’t need one. It’s great to conquer their ships and take their booty. Who needs them? I sail the seas alone.
Arrrrrgh!
I see it as a way to increase their income and bottom line.
I’m going with the Ceton Cablecard Quad-Tuner. It enables Media Center PCs to play or record up to four live channels of HDTV at once, and stream live HD channels or recordings to multiple HDTVs throughout the home. I’m done dealing with my cable provider’s set top box with its slow UI.
Time Warner only sees profit. They insist I rent their garbage set top control box, at $6 per month, per set. I’ve got 4 televisions, so that’s more than $275 per year in tuner box rent alone. These boxes can’t cost them more than $30 each to make, but TW won’t tell us their exact cost, nor can I purchase such a box myself – they won’t activate it. Even though I can buy the same make//model tuner box on e-Bay for $80, new, TW says it is a bootleg tuner, and they refuse to discuss it with me. The FCC told the cable companies two years ago they could sell these boxes, so why don’t they?
Why do you concentrate on BRCM when they aren’t even selling Moca chips yet? You barely mentinon Entropic, but they have the only two companies that are rolling Moca out, Verizon and DirecTV. Strange to concentrate on BRCM that seems to be all talk while glossing over the company that has won the designs and actually shipping mass product.
Hi Harper — Broadcom’s an Orange County company so I write about it more than others, as I’m expected to do since I work for the O.C. Register. Broadcom is “sampling” the chips to manufacturers so it’s not like they’re not in the game.
I also write for consumers first, not necessarily investors. Who makes the chips inside doesn’t always interest readers; rather, I prefer to write about what the devices can ultimately do.
Are any other areas using Entone Hydras or Amulets like here in Ohio? The Hydra offers 3 tv hookups in one receiver and dvr service to the same 3 tvs. Entone appears to have a good box but I am understanding there has been issues with them.
What is a good Coax HPNA Network Adapter that is currently being used?